Effects of Annulus Geometry and Liquid Properties on the Well Conditions during UBD Operation

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Gas and Petroleum, Yasouj University, Gachsaran, Iran

2 Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Well conditions during drilling operation can be predicted using numerical simulation. During under-balanced drilling (UBD) operation, controlling the bottom-hole pressure (BHP) in a suitable range and also appropriate hole-cleaning is essential. In this paper, numerical simulation of gas-liquid-solid three-phase flow in the annulus is used to study the effects of annulus geometry and also liquid properties on the BHP and hole-cleaning during UBD operation. To validate the numerical simulation, the results are compared with the experimental data from a laboratory study. Also, the gain results from developed code are compared with the actual field data from a real well, several mechanistic models from WellFlo software, and gas- liquid two- fluid numerical simulation. Due to the significance of controlling the BHP and hole-cleaning during UBD operation, the effects of annulus geometry and liquid phase properties on BHP and the solid volume fraction distribution are investigated. According to the results, changing the hydraulic diameter and cross-sectional area of the annulus can affect BHP and hole- cleaning in UBD operation. In other words, increasing the hydraulic diameter at a constant cross- sectional area improves hole-cleaning and decrease BHP. Also, decreasing the cross-sectional area at a constant hydraulic diameter improves hole-cleaning and increase BHP. The results show that the liquid viscosity affects hole-cleaning through two contrary mechanisms. In fact, by increasing the liquid viscosity, carrying capacity of the liquid phase is increased and cutting transfer velocity is decreased.

Keywords

[1] Guo B., Hareland G., Rajtar J., 1996, Computer Simulation Predicts Unfavorable Mud Rate and Optimum Air Injection Rate for Aerated Mud Drilling, SPE Drilling & Completion 11 (02): 61-66.
[2] Fan J., Gao C., Taihe S., Liu H., Yu Z., 2001, A comprehensive model and computer simulation for under-balanced drilling in oil and gas wells, Paper SPE 68495 preresented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable held in Houston, Texas, 7–8 March
[3] Lage A. C. V. M., (Ph.D Dissertation) 2000, Two-Phase Flow Models and Experiments for Low-Head and Underbalanced Drilling, Stavanger University College.
[4] Lage A., Time R., 2002, Experimental and theoretical investigation of upward two-phase flow in annuli, SPE journal 7 (03): 325-336.
[5] Guo B., Ghalambor A., 2002, An innovation in designing under-balanced drilling flow rates: A gas-liquid rate window (GLRW) Approach, Paper SPE 77237 presented at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology held in Jakarta, Indonesia, 9–11 September.
[6] Perez-Tellez C. P., (Ph.D. thesis) 2003, Improved Bottom-hole Pressure Control for Underbalanced Drilling Operations. Department of Petroleum Engineering, Louisiana State University.
[7] Perez-Tellez C. P., Smith J. R., Edwards J. K., 2003, A new comprehensive mechanistic model for underbalanced drilling improves wellbore pressure prediction, SPE Drill Completion 18 (3): 199–208.
[8] Fadairo A. S., Adekomaya O., Falode O. A., 2009, Effects of drilling cuttings transport on pressure drop in a flowing well, Paper SPE/IADC 125707 preresented at the Middle East Drilling Technology Conference & Exhibition held in Manama, Bahrain, 26-28 October.
[9] Yan T., Wang K., Sun X., Luan S., Shao S., 2014, State-of-the-art cuttings transport with aerated liquid and foam in complex structure wells, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 37: 560-568.
[10] Khezrian M., Hajidavalloo E., Shekari Y., 2015, Modeling and simulation of under-balanced drilling operation using two-fluid model of two-phase flow, Chemical Engineering Research and Design 93: 30-37.
[11] Hajidavalloo E., Falavand Jozaei A., Azimi A., Shekari Y., Ghobadpouri S., 2018, Thermal simulation of two-phase flow in under-balanced drilling operation with oil and gas production, Journal of Computational Applied Mechanics 49: 314-322.
[12] Li X., Ma H., Zhao H., Gao D., Lu B., Ding S., Gong D., Ma Z., 2020, Study on the model for predicting maximum allowable measured depth of a horizontal well drilled with underbalanced operation, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 191: 1-8.
[13] Evje S., Flatten T., 2003, Hybrid flux-splitting schemes for a common two-fluid model, Journal of Computational Physics 192 (1): 175-210.
[14] Hatta N., Fujimoto H., Isobe M., Kang J. S., 1998, Theoretical analysis of flow characteristics of multiphase mixtures in a vertical pipe, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 24 (04): 539-561.
[15] Dranchuk P. M., Abu-Kassem J. H., 1975, Calculations of Z-factors for natural gases using equation of state, J. Can. Pet. Technol, 14 (03): 14–34.
[16] Bratland, O., 2010, Pipe Flow 2, Multiphase Flow Assurance. www.drbratland.com.
[17] Smith S., Gregory G., Munro N., Muqeem M., 2000, Application of multiphase flow methods to horizontal underbalanced drilling, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 39 (10): 52-60.
 [18] Beggs H. D., Robinson J. R., 1975, Estimating the viscosity of crude oil systems, Journal of Petroleum Technology 27 (09): 1140-1141.
Volume 52, Issue 2
June 2021
Pages 246-255
  • Receive Date: 16 December 2020
  • Accept Date: 11 February 2021
  • First Publish Date: 01 June 2021