Numerical Study of a Pipe Extension Effect in Draft Tube on Hydraulic Turbine Performance

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

2 School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Draft tube of Francis type hydraulic turbine usually consists of: cone, elbow and diffuser. On the contrary, in some power stations an extra pipe should be added to the draft tube at the bottom of cone because of installation limitation. In this paper, this special case has been numerically studied. To this end CFD analysis was applied to simulate all parts of hydraulic turbine. A homogeneous multiphase model with Rayleigh-Plesset cavitation model was applied for presence of cavitation. The results reveal that the additional tube causes pressure drop and severe cavitation at the trailing edge of runner blades. Also, results showed that the efficiency reduces in comparison with original hill-diagram of model test in which this extension was not considered. With the removal of the extension tube, the efficiency increased significantly. The comparison of pressure recovery factors along draft tube, and theoretical investigation showed that the height of the draft tube is an important parameter and addition of an extra pipe will cause reduction in draft tube performance and increases the probability of occurrence of cavitation under the runner.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1]           H. Keck, M. Sick, Thirty years of numerical flow simulation in hydraulic turbomachines, Acta mechanica, Vol. 201, No. 1-4, pp. 211-229, 2008.
[2]           J. Hellström, B. Marjavaara, T. Lundström, Parallel CFD simulations of an original and redesigned hydraulic turbine draft tube, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 338-344, 2007.
[3]           M. Mohammadi, E. Hajidavalloo, M. Behbahani-Nejad, Investigation on Combined Air and Water Injection in Francis Turbine Draft Tube to Reduce Vortex Rope Effects, Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 141, No. 5, pp. 051301, 2019.
[4]           J. Yang, Q. Hu, Z. Wang, J. Ding, X. Jiang, Effects of inlet cavitation on swirling flow in draft-tube cone, Engineering Computations, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 1694-1705, 2018.
[5]           J. Yang, L. Zhou, Z. Wang, The numerical simulation of draft tube cavitation in Francis turbine at off-design conditions, Engineering Computations, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 139-155, 2016.
[6]           T. M. Arispe, W. de Oliveira, R. G. Ramirez, Francis turbine draft tube parameterization and analysis of performance characteristics using CFD techniques, Renewable energy, Vol. 127, pp. 114-124, 2018.
[7]           M. H. Shojaeefard, A. Mirzaei, A. Babaei, Shape optimization of draft tubes for Agnew microhydro turbines, Energy conversion and management, Vol. 79, pp. 681-689, 2014.
[8]           H. Foroutan, S. Yavuzkurt, An axisymmetric model for draft tube flow at partial load, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 195-205, 2016.
[9]           M. chol Nam, B. Dechun, Y. Xiangji, J. Mingri, Design optimization of hydraulic turbine draft tube based on CFD and DOE method, in Proceeding of, IOP Publishing, pp. 012019.
[10]         G. Demirel, E. Acar, K. Celebioglu, S. Aradag, CFD-driven surrogate-based multi-objective shape optimization of an elbow type draft tube, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 42, No. 28, pp. 17601-17610, 2017.
[11]         R. Susan-Resiga, G. D. Ciocan, I. Anton, F. Avellan, Analysis of the swirling flow downstream a Francis turbine runner, Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 1, pp. 177-189, 2006.
[12]         P. Gohil, R. Saini, Numerical Study of Cavitation in Francis Turbine of a Small Hydro Power Plant, Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2016.
[13]         K. Anup, Y. H. Lee, B. Thapa, CFD study on prediction of vortex shedding in draft tube of Francis turbine and vortex control techniques, Renewable energy, Vol. 86, pp. 1406-1421, 2016.
[14]         J. Nejad, A. Riasi, A. Nourbakhsh, Parametric study and performance improvement of regenerative flow pump considering the modification in blade and casing geometry, International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 1887-1906, 2017.
[15]         M. Morgut, D. Jošt, A. Škerlavaj, E. Nobile, G. Contento, Numerical Predictions of Cavitating Flow Around a Marine Propeller and Kaplan Turbine Runner with Calibrated Cavitation Models, Strojniski Vestnik/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 64, No. 9, 2018.
[16]         F. Avellan, Introduction to cavitation in hydraulic machinery, Politehnica University of Timișoara,  pp. 2004.
[17]         H. Zhang, L. Zhang, Numerical simulation of cavitating turbulent flow in a high head Francis turbine at part load operation with OpenFOAM, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 31, pp. 156-165, 2012.
[18]         R. Goyal, M. J. Cervantes, B. K. Gandhi, Vortex rope formation in a high head model Francis turbine, Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 4, pp. 041102, 2017.
[19]         R. Susan-Resiga, S. Muntean, A. Stuparu, A. Bosioc, C. Tănasă, C. Ighişan, A variational model for swirling flow states with stagnant region, European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, Vol. 55, pp. 104-115, 2016.
[20]         B. Mulu, M. Cervantes, C. Devals, T. Vu, F. Guibault, Simulation-based investigation of unsteady flow in near-hub region of a Kaplan Turbine with experimental comparison, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 139-156, 2015.
[21]         R. Susan-Resiga, S. Muntean, V. Hasmatuchi, I. Anton, F. Avellan, Analysis and prevention of vortex breakdown in the simplified discharge cone of a Francis turbine, Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 5, pp. 051102, 2010. 

Volume 51, Issue 1
June 2020
Pages 46-54
  • Receive Date: 02 October 2019
  • Revise Date: 01 May 2020
  • Accept Date: 01 May 2020